Rosenberg and Rosenberg Law Firm - Florida Auto Accident Lawyers
  • Blog
 
Florida Lawyer Practice Areas
 
Auto Accidents Car Accidents
 
 
Motorcycle Accidents Motorcycle Accidents
 
 
Personal Injury Personal Injury
 
 
Workers' Compensation Workers Compensation
 
 
Slip & Fall Slip and Fall
 
Attorney Links and FAQs
 

Workers' Comp Faq

Florida No Fault Faq

Uninsured Motorist Faq

Criminal Defense Areas

Links

Charities

Employee of the month

| locations we serve |



 
  Legal News  

Legal News



Justices Shield Medical Devices From Lawsuits

Summary:
Makers of medical devices like implantable defibrillators or breast implants are immune from liability for personal injuries as long as the Food and Drug Administration approved the device before it was marketed and it meets the agency’s specifications, the Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.

The 8-to-1 decision was a victory for the Bush administration, which for years has sought broad authority to pre-empt tougher state regulation.

In 2004, the administration reversed longstanding federal policy and began arguing that “premarket approval” of a new medical device by the F.D.A. overrides most claims for damages under state law. Because federal law makes no provision for damage suits against device makers, injured patients have turned to state law and have won substantial awards.

The Bush administration will continue its push for pre-emption in another F.D.A. case that the court has accepted for its next term, on whether the agency’s approval of a drug, as opposed to a device, pre-empts personal injury suits. Drugs and medical devices are regulated under separate laws.

The case before the court concerned only medical devices that had gone through the premarket approval process specified by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Most devices now available reached the market through a different process, under which the F.D.A. found them to be “substantially equivalent” to those marketed before the 1976 law took effect.

Click hyperlink above for complete article.


Defective Products vs. The Supreme Court. They Fight, You Lose

Summary:
On February 21st the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, in concert with Rinnai America Corp, announced a voluntary product safety recall involving the defective product Rinnai EnergySaver Direct-Vent Wall Furnace, due to a potential carbon monoxide hazard.

 

According to the alert a gasket in the furnace, fuelled by either natural gas or propane, could fail—posing a risk of poisonous carbon monoxide gas leaking into the home.

Carbon monoxide is odorless and colorless, adding further fuel to the fire, as it were. So far there have been 11 reports of carbon monoxide leaking from the Japanese-made furnace, according to the manufacturer. There have been no injuries or deaths—yet.

The recall involves some 50,000 units.

What makes this recall, and the potential for injury or death all the more compelling, is the US Supreme Court decision this week that prevents patients inured by medical devices from suing the manufacturer in State court, provided the device was approved for marketing by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and manufactured to FDA specs.

Click hyperlink above for complete article. 



Weston doctor wins one of largest compensatory asbestos awards

50-year-old Weston doctor dying of a rare form of cancer has won a $24.2 million products liability verdict against a company that exposed him to asbestos.

Stephen Guilder worked on tractors and cars in the 1970s and early 1980s before attending medical school at the University of Miami. He claimed brakes made by Honeywell International’s predecessor contained asbestos that caused his mesothelioma.

A Miami-Dade Circuit Court jury deliberated for less than three hours Friday before agreeing Honeywell’s negligence caused Guilder’s illness after.

The panel awarded Guilder and his family one of the largest compensatory verdicts against a single defendant in an asbestos case, according to Guilder’s attorney, David Jagolinzer with the Ferraro Law Firm in Miami.

Guilder was awarded $10.1 million for lost earnings, pain and suffering and medical expenses. His wife, Sheila, won $3.6 million for loss of her husband’s services and comfort. His three children, Ariel, 18, Alex, 16, and Ross, 14, were awarded $3.5 million each.

Guilder was diagnosed in September. The case was filed in October and expedited due to Guilder’s shortened lifespan.

Honeywell issued a statement Monday saying it was disappointed with the verdict but was “confident we will ultimately prevail on appeal.”

The trial lasted two weeks. 
 

 
FREE CONSULTATION: (888) 565-HURT

Florida personal injury lawyer, Florida workers’ compensation lawyer disclaimer: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or any of our associated pages, documents, blog, e-mails, or written communication should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information on this website does not in any way constitute, an attorney – client relationship. Our attorneys practice in the following areas: auto accidents, truck accidents, work related accidents, motorcycle accidents, slip and fall accidents, trip and fall accidents, dog bites, product liability, wrongful death, nursing home negligence, and all personal injury related accidents.

If you have questions about hiring the Florida personal injury firm of Rosenberg & Rosenberg, contact us today, so that we may answer your questions and schedule a FREE consultation. We understand that the hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.

Serving -Broward County, Hollywood, Florida, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, Plantation, Florida, Davie, Florida, Palm Beach, Florida, Ft. Myers, Florida, Lee County, Palm Beach County, and all of Florida.